brant (brant) v.i. - to simultaneously brag and rant.

brant (brant) n. - a shared on-line journal where people can post brags and rants about themselves and their personal experiences, opinions, observations, and feelings.

branted, brant-ing, brants intr.v. To write entries in, add material to, or maintain a (we)brant.

February 8, 2007

Laura’s Latest Crush: The Barefoot Contessa

*

Though she’s never branted about this, Laura tends to get crushes on people. It’s a long story which Laura The Reluctant Branter will someday tell, but for now she’s going to cut to the chase and get right to the heart (if you’ll pardon the pun) of the issue:

Laura has a new crush.

After spending almost two months recuperating from surgery in bed flipping channels, she ended up, oddly enough, tiring of her usual favorites — true-crime-forensic-into-the-mind-of-a serial-killer-documentaries leavened-by-grotesque-and-annoying [because of Vincent D’Onofrio] “Law and Order: Criminal Intent”-reruns — and instead watching the Food Network. It took only a day or two (let’s be frank — it actually only took a few minutes) for Laura to get deeply bothered by most of the Celebrity Chef Line-Up — Emeril (annoying); Rachel Ray (too chatty and gabby = annoying), Nigella Lawson (too bosomy), Giada De Laurentis (too thin); Michael Chiarello (too lounge-lizardy); Paula Deen (frightening), and the worst of all, Sandra Lee’s “Semi-Homemade Cooking” (extremely frightening). But just as she was about to give up on the TV Food Network and grab the remote she fell in love:

With Ina Garten. Otherwise known as The Barefoot Contessa.

ina_garten2006_d[1].jpg

Could she be any cuter?
[photo downloaded from foodtv.com]

The minute Laura first happened upon the Barefoot Contessa show, she was hooked. She loved everything about Ina Garten and her show (which has been on for a long time and which clearly shows Laura to be a little slow on the uptake and quite the opposite of a trend-setter). She loves how good and simple Ina’s food is and how Laura thinks that even she, if she wants to, could make it herself. She loves Ina’s enormous shingled house in East Hampton. She loves Ina’s terrific sense of humor. She loves her plumpness and her frequent acknowledgement of using too much butter (“Why does eveything always start with a half a pound of butter? I’m getting a bad reputation…”) but how she uses it anyway (“I know it’s a lot of butter but it’s a lot of pecan squares”). She loves her shiny hair and her black coat and green scarf she wears to go shopping in town. She loves her key phrases — “How easy is that?” and “How fabulous is that?” and can’t get enough of her perfect mixture of sophistication and self-deprecation. And she loves that it makes her slightly uncomfortable and grossed out to see how adoring she is of her husband Jeffrey.

JeffGarten.jpg

[Jeffrey Garten promotional/press photo.]

The more episodes Laura watched — brisket and chopped liver; beef stew; roasted chicken; lamb kebobs and tomato-feta salad; cheddar corn chowder, black-and-white angel food cake; pecan bars, espresso ice cream, apple pie — Laura could go on and on and on — the bigger her crush grew. And the more it grew, the more she knew that while Ina Garten was absolutely and undeniably crush-worthy, Laura’s crush on her was deeply neurotic.

Laura thought long and hard about why she was developing such a crush on this woman, not just because it was increasing exponentially by the day like a giant rising mushroom cloud, but also because Laura doesn’t usually develop crushes on celebrities (okay, except for Hugh Jackman and Nia Vardalos, but she’s admitted that before: see Who’s Laura?” website page), let alone on chefs, mainly because Laura hardly ever cooks (it’s a long story, which will be told in a future brant). Episode after episode, rerun after rerun, Laura watched and self-analyzed until finally she understood what it was that she was truly responding to:

Ina Garten’s devotion to making her friends and family (Jeffrey) reallllly happy with realllllly good food.

This selflessness and single-minded goal to focus on making other people happy was a novel concept to Laura. Most people in general — and television chefs in particular — are full of ego, and while they can cook (well, Laura’s not too sure if what that creepy Sandra Lee does on her “Semi Homemade Cooking” show officially constitutes cooking), they are usually more pre-occupied with the attention they’re getting than with the attention they’re giving.

Needless to say, it didn’t take long before Laura developed a full-blown obsession with Ina Garten and her Happiness-Making-Mission and wished there were a way for her to meet Ina and become part of her life so that Ina would cook for her. The more she thought about their non-existent friendship — how much she and Ina had in common since Ina had left her career years ago as a White House nuclear policy analyst to try something completely new and different and life-altering for which she’d had no prior experience — buying and running an established gourmet store in the Hamptons — and Laura had left her career as a publicist to try something new (having a life) and different (having a bedroom) and life-altering (moving to Washington to have a 9 to 5 government desk job) for which she’d had no prior experience — she realized finally what goes on in the minds of celebrity-obsessed-people: they truly begin to believe that they and the celebrity would be “best friends” if only they could meet.

This realization scared Laura — she’d not only never thought like that about anyone, but certainly never about a “celebrity” — and she decided to try to ground herself and contain her crush by going through proper channels — namely, Ina Garten’s website. It didn’t take long for Laura to see that she was not alone in her demented wish-fulfillment fantasy disorder because when she clicked on the “Questions and Answers” section, there were lots and lots and lots of similarly infantile people ahead of her desperately wanting in with Ina. The first two questions that Laura focused on were bad enough:

“How can I find the shirts that Ina wears on the show?”

and:

“I’m coming to East Hampton. Where should I stay?”

(Is Laura crazy or does that last one sound like a threat?). But the third question is the one that really showed Laura how [creepily] “devoted” Ina’s fans are to her:

Q: How can I be a guest on the show?

A: As you probably know, all the guests on the show are really my good friends. Many people have asked to be guests, but my producer and I feel that it’s more authentic if the guests continue to be my friends. Since the show is filmed in my kitchen in East Hampton, unfortunately, there’s no extra room for an audience.

While Laura marvels at the graciousness of Ina’s response, Laura knows that her crush must remain that way — just a crush. Laura still watches Ina Garten on TV as she cooks for all her friends, and she still wishes she were one of them so that Ina would cook for her, but Laura knows the limitations (boundaries) of her crush and where the firm lines of reality and fantasy must be drawn: She will brant endlessly about having a crush on Ina Garten, but she would never be so pathetic as to ask if she could be a guest on her show.

This post was read by 44974 people until now.

October 30, 2006

Major P.O.V. Confusion

Wow. Laura just read the posting about adding photos to her brant and she was shocked to see that without realizing it she switched from third person to first person and then back to third person during the course of that very short posting. As always, Laura chose not to edit out the strange inconsistencies of voice — she believes strongly in keeping her brant entries immediate and wholly honest no matter how psychologically revealing they may be — and she knows this leaves her open and vulnerable to analysis from every dimestore armchair psychologist out there. As always, Laura welcomes any and all comments — as long as people are writing about her and thinking about her and discussing her to her face, she is always interested in what people have to say.

This post was read by 25511 people until now.

September 15, 2006

Ten more days

For those of you (besides Laura) who are counting the days before “Piece of Work” is published, there are only ten more days between now, September 15, and the official publication date of September 25. Laura thinks she’s done the math right (25 minus 15 = 10), but just in case she hasn’t she’s showing her work (maybe if she hadn’t gotten an 11 on her math final in her junior year of high school she would have more faith in her ability to do math, if you can even call simple addition, or subtraction, math). If she’s made a mistake in her calculation, please bring the error to her attention by leaving a comment here on her brant (just make sure you sign it “Smarty-Pants”).

Not to get bogged down in more figures and numbers (this is the most math Laura has done in years), but in the 15 days since her first brant entries Laura got pretty busy. She meant to keep her brant current with interesting and entertaining entries to satisfy her rabid readers (although from what she can tell about them so far, she’s not sure satisfying her readers is possible because they are SO incredibly rabid), but she was kind of swamped (inundated, actually) with enthusiastic responses to her website. Yes, okay, so a lot of the praise was for the site designer’s (Jefferson Rabb’s) actual design of the site (”cool”, “hip”, and “modern” are three words Laura got really sick of hearing this week), but she, too, received her share of comments regarding the content. While most people (allegedly) enjoyed the faux-narcissistic voice of the third-person narrator (also known as “Laura The Branter”), one or two people (buzz-killers) doubted the fact that Laura is really as insecure as she makes herself out to be. In other words, they wonder if her self-deprecation is an act. This struck Laura as incredibly funny (in fact, she would have started laughing hysterically if she wasn’t already crying hysterically because of how wounded she felt having her credibility called into question like that). All Laura can say is that these doubters (buzz-killers) must not know her very well. In fact, Laura wants to reassure everyone that she is even more insecure in real life than she makes herself out to be on her website!

(OK, well obviously that’s a lie, but you know what she means.)

Laura also wants to call attention to the fact that her theories about celebrity narcissism (featured in “Piece of Work”) are actually based in sound scientific research. To prove that she does her homework before shooting her mouth off (even though, technically, she shot her mouth off long before this bit of supporting research was released), she’d like you to read this September 13th article from the Los Angeles Times — “Celebrities Are Their Own Biggest Fans.” (Again, she’s providing the link even though she doesn’t know how to get the link to light up and do it’s linking-thing.)

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/cl-et-narcissism12sep12,1,5835330.story?track=crosspromo&coll=la-headlines-entnews&ctrack=1&cset=true

This post was read by 56232 people until now.